Course coordinator: Tünde Cserpes
E-Mail: tunde.cserpes@mgmt.au.dk
Lecturers: Carsten Bergenholtz, Tünde Cserpes, John Thøgersen
Workload: 5 ECTS
Administrative assistance: Lisbeth Widahl
Office/student hours: Fridays between 10:00-12:00 or by appointment. Click on the “schedule time with me” button on my website.
Time and place:
Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Allé 4, Aarhus V
Course description
What does it mean when seminar participants or journal referees claim that your manuscript has an endogeneity problem or a failed identification strategy? How do you create a research design which allows you to make causal claims in a paper? With a point of departure in counterfactual thinking, this Ph.D. course introduces a toolbox of quantitative analytical techniques to better ground causal claims in academic texts.
This course will not resemble the statistics courses you have taken in the past. The course covers two perspectives that take different approaches to establish causality: design-based quasi-experimental methods and structural equation modeling. Instead of focusing on proofs and equations, we use directed acyclic graphs to visualize the assumptions underlying our research questions. We learn the methods by reading about the underlying intuition behind them, seeing them work in published empirical articles, and replicating them using software packages.
As the tradition of counterfactual thinking has its roots in econometrics, the textbook and several of the assigned papers will also come from this field. But we will not use these texts as economists, we will use the teaching materials to discuss issues that pertain to common research practices in management academia.
The goal of this class is to de-mystify the concepts and skills involved in quantitative analysis, to spark your interest in designing your own study, and to facilitate that you become an engaged and collaborative contributor to the academic community.
Learning outcomes
This class arms you with a quantitative toolkit to understand the intuition behind the different analytical techniques.
1. Knowledge
2. Skills
3. Competences
Prerequisites
While the course does not emphasize formulas or equations, the covered material assumes that you already have a basic understanding of probability theory and inferential statistics.
A list of books if you aim to brush up on your skills:
Course requirements
There are four main requirements to this course:
1. Pre-course survey
2. Reading
3. Attendance & active participation
4. Final assignment
1. Pre-course survey
Course participants fill out a short quantitative survey before the first class to assess their level of familiarity with statistical concepts.
2. Reading
A note on pre-class reading
It is a matter of professional courtesy that you come to class prepared. You will have to read approximately 50-100 pages per week, a chapter from one of the core books, and a published empirical article. Depending on your level of familiarity with reading quantitative texts, pre-class preparation time will vary from person to person. However, I suggest budgeting at least 3-4 hours before each class. I will also provide a list of discussion questions in advance to help adjust to the heavy load.
Reading materials
There are two core books and a selection of empirical articles. I expect you to gain access to the books on your own. The empirical articles will be available on Brightspace.
Core books
|
3. Attendance & active participation
Classes combine lectures, discussions, and in-class individual or group work to facilitate active learning. We will spend class time making connections between the assigned readings and empirical problems through various exercises. Therefore, I expect that you ask questions and contribute to the discussions.
Attending class is pivotal. The topics build on each other, so if you miss a day, you will have to first learn the material for that day before you can start preparing for the next one. Moreover, it is the requirement of the Ph.D. School that students attend all class sessions. Therefore, I ask you to block out class time in your calendar early to minimize the likelihood of scheduling conflicts.
Attendance policy
|
4. Final assignment
Task
Students write a three-pager review (excluding references) of an article published in a top generalist journal. I match students to pre-selected articles with a roll of dice on the last day of class.
Evaluation
Pass or fail.
Learning goal
Reviewing colleagues’ work in an informal capacity (= friendly reviews) and through journal requests (= formal reviews) is an unpaid but rewarding part of the academic career. You get early exposure to new ideas and your feedback will shape the quality of the presentation of those ideas. This assignment aims to nudge you to see with a reviewer’s eye when reading scientific articles.
One outcome is that it will force you to think about your audience. What you write as a reviewer affects the author(s) of the paper! For that reason, focusing on a few key issues and how you frame your criticism is key.
Another outcome is that this exercise might prompt you to seek out opportunities as a reviewer through your adviser and at conferences.
Final examDeadline for take-home: 5 December 2024 via Brightspace |
Application/intent to register
The deadline to register is 4 September 2024, via email to Lisbeth Widahl Christensen (liw@mgmt.au.dk). The application form is available under this link. Note that registration is binding.
Fee
The course is free of charge for PhD students from Aarhus University. Participants from outside Aarhus University will have to pay a fee to cover lunch and refreshments.
Lunch
We order vegetarian lunch for all attendees by default. If you prefer vegan or meat options and if you need to report food allergies, write an email to Lisbeth Widahl Christensen before the course starts.
Software
Important! Licenses renew each year on September 1, so be mindful of when you purchase the software. During the first six lectures, we use Stata 17.